C-97 Still Losing Engines!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Terry Carraway
    replied
    Originally posted by Jase Pence View Post
    Terry, other than the engine swallowing great quantities of oil quickly, and EOP going down (EOP stair stepping down happened first, quickly followed by oil quantity dropping, fairly linearly. Feathering was iniatiated shortly thereafter) I have no idea what broke/let go first.

    I told Tim that when we swap engines, I'm taking the shelled out one home for some "forensic investigation " . Luckily I have wreckers, to get 5,000 lbs of engine into my basement

    I'm also contemplating a "Reno style fundraiser". So much for a piston, so much for an empty cylinder.... but I *really* want to know what shelled first and how to prevent it going forward.

    Best
    Jase
    Yeap, figure out what went wrong, and how to add a sensor to tell you that it is happening.

    How about Go Fund Me?

    Leave a comment:


  • Russell Holton
    replied
    Originally posted by Jase Pence View Post
    I told Tim that when we swap engines, I'm taking the shelled out one home for some "forensic investigation " . Luckily I have wreckers, to get 5,000 lbs of engine into my basement

    .... but I *really* want to know what shelled first and how to prevent it going forward.
    Atta boy! Go for it! (We want pictures.)

    Leave a comment:


  • Jase Pence
    replied
    Originally posted by Randy Sohn View Post

    Chuckls, recalling that a few new F/Es used to just stare in amazement at that magneto selector - try'n to remember, what was it, four mags each engine?

    At any rate, "good ole daze",

    best, randy
    Ours, the -59B, has four mags per engine. The earlier ones (such as on the Hughes HK-4 Spruce Goose) had 7 mags per engine. <evil evil grin> These are *my* good ole daze Randy!!

    Best
    Jase

    Leave a comment:


  • Randy Sohn
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Hartmann View Post
    truly a "corncob" engine ...
    Chuckls, recalling that a few new F/Es used to just stare in amazement at that magneto selector - try'n to remember, what was it, four mags each engine?

    At any rate, "good ole daze",

    best, randy

    Leave a comment:


  • Jeff Hartmann
    replied
    Originally posted by Jase Pence View Post

    I want you to know, Jeff, that this picture has given me nightmares... cold sweats.... and possibly a plague of locusts in the garden!! Geeezo Pete. "If 28 cylinders are good, 56 must be great!!"

    Did it actually run or was it an empty mockup for giggles?

    Best
    Jase
    I have no idea if it ran, or was intended to run, made me grin ... it is truly a "corncob" engine ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Randy Sohn
    replied
    Originally posted by Jase Pence View Post
    I told Tim that
    Chuckle, tell'im "Hi" from me and I always thought that the R-2000s were much more reliable. Chuckle1

    best, randy

    Leave a comment:


  • Jase Pence
    replied
    Originally posted by Jeff Hartmann View Post
    Saw this at Reno last year....

    As soon as we get the rocker covers on we'll be ready to run. (remember the IO-720 lycoming was 2 1O-360s so why not 2 4360s)
    I want you to know, Jeff, that this picture has given me nightmares... cold sweats.... and possibly a plague of locusts in the garden!! Geeezo Pete. "If 28 cylinders are good, 56 must be great!!"

    Did it actually run or was it an empty mockup for giggles?

    Best
    Jase

    Leave a comment:


  • Jase Pence
    replied
    Originally posted by Terry Carraway View Post
    What is/was the failure mode of the scavenge pump?

    Maybe a chip detector down stream of each one to see the bits starting to come off.
    Terry, other than the engine swallowing great quantities of oil quickly, and EOP going down (EOP stair stepping down happened first, quickly followed by oil quantity dropping, fairly linearly. Feathering was iniatiated shortly thereafter) I have no idea what broke/let go first.

    I told Tim that when we swap engines, I'm taking the shelled out one home for some "forensic investigation " . Luckily I have wreckers, to get 5,000 lbs of engine into my basement

    I'm also contemplating a "Reno style fundraiser". So much for a piston, so much for an empty cylinder.... but I *really* want to know what shelled first and how to prevent it going forward.

    Best
    Jase

    Leave a comment:


  • Terry Carraway
    replied
    What is/was the failure mode of the scavenge pump?

    Maybe a chip detector down stream of each one to see the bits starting to come off.

    Leave a comment:


  • Randy Sohn
    replied
    Originally posted by Jase Pence View Post
    my -1 for ours sez........per hour per engine
    Ho-boy, mucho gracias, all my -1s for the As, Ds, Fs and Gs have "gone west" somewhere, used to have them and now I know why! Anyhow, guess that I never had seen it written down so I really dunno, only heard it pronouned. 56 gallons rings a bell with me. Our Gs had been tankers somewhere before we got them at the MN ANG and while on active duty during the Berlin crisus I'd been sent down to the ANG unit at Savannah once for several months to instruct and that's where I flew the Fs. Spent a lotta time flying and instructing and examining in them but just never thought any more about it.

    best, randy

    Leave a comment:


  • Jase Pence
    replied
    Randy, could your G rotor pump be "gerotor pump"?



    Getting into the engine manuals here, there's 2 oil pumps, front and rear. The front has 1 pressure compartment and 2 scavenge compartments. Rear pump has 2 pressure compartments and 3 scavenge compartments. Still looking for a picture of one of these creatures, but good grief!! Well hell, everything *else* on the engine is huge....why shouldn't the oil pumps (!!) be proportional?!??

    Best
    Jase

    Leave a comment:


  • Jase Pence
    replied
    Originally posted by Randy Sohn View Post

    Try'na recall now what we had in each oil tank on the 97s - 35 gals.? Anyone remember/know?

    best, randy
    Randy, my -1 for ours sez 32.5 gallon capacity, with 7 gallon expansion room for the nacelle tanks. We have 2 fuselage tanks, each holds 56 gallons with 2 gallon expansion room. There's a 7gpm pump that transfers oil from each fuselage tank (one pump per tank) to any of the nacelle tanks in flight. So, total tank age capacity is 242 gallons if everything is full to the scuppers. I'm told that on long trips, they used to carry an extra barrel or two to replenish the fuse tanks. According to Pratt's engine manual, *accepted consumption* is 1.5 to 4 gallons of oil per hour per engine.

    best
    jase

    Leave a comment:


  • Randy Sohn
    replied
    Originally posted by Bruce Gorrell View Post

    suspect it was more
    Just can't recall for sure now, tho I did forget to mention the spare oil tank we had down in the "hellhole" beneath the cockpit's floor. IIRC, it had an 80/90/135/?? gallon capacity that the F/E could tranfer/pump to any engine via a selector switch on his panel.

    Longest leg I ever flew was one from London to Goose via Stephenville (Harmon), 15+45 IIRC, deadheaded over to Mildenhall, England to get and return one that Bobby had left over there for an engine change. IIRC again, it was 48-0607 ("Sick-ole-seven" we always called it).

    best, randy

    Leave a comment:


  • Bruce Gorrell
    replied
    Originally posted by Randy Sohn View Post

    Try'na recall now what we had in each oil tank on the 97s - 35 gals.? Anyone remember/know?

    best, randy
    I suspect it was more than that. We have 40 a side with only 2/3 of the cylinders. And MUCH less range.

    Leave a comment:


  • Randy Sohn
    replied
    Originally posted by Russell Holton View Post
    (23 gallons lost in 90 seconds
    Try'na recall now what we had in each oil tank on the 97s - 35 gals.? Anyone remember/know?

    best, randy

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X