Originally posted by Scott Dyer HPN/NY
View Post
What in the purple hell was that???
Collapse
X
-
Today's primary radar is S band, 2.42.7 GHz. Nothing like 978 or 1090 MHz.Originally posted by Ray Tackett View Post
Yep, and radar used to operate in what is now the FM broadcast band. Shorter wavelengths equal more fun with reflections, absorbtion, and interference patterns, regardless of the information which modulates the carriers.
Leave a comment:
-
No, Russell, ADS-B out transmits every second, regardless of radar coverage.Originally posted by Russell Holton View PostAs I understand it, ADS-B is usually triggered by a radar sweep. In a congested airspace with multiple radars, two transponders could be triggered at the same time. The parity bits may not catch the corruption every time.
What we're seeing is a "still". I'd like to see what the "movie" it comes from reveals.
Leave a comment:
-
As I understand it, ADS-B is usually triggered by a radar sweep. In a congested airspace with multiple radars, two transponders could be triggered at the same time. The parity bits may not catch the corruption every time.Originally posted by Ray Tackett View PostShorter wavelengths equal more fun with reflections, absorbtion, and interference patterns, regardless of the information which modulates the carriers.
What we're seeing is a "still". I'd like to see what the "movie" it comes from reveals.
Leave a comment:
-
Yep, and radar used to operate in what is now the FM broadcast band. Shorter wavelengths equal more fun with reflections, absorbtion, and interference patterns, regardless of the information which modulates the carriers.Originally posted by Scott Dyer HPN/NY View Post
Ray -- ADS-B operates at 978 and 1090 MHz. The echoes that are discussed are from primary radar, not DME/Mode C transponders, as I understand it.
Back in the mode C days, when I was flying traffic watch on weekday evenings, I almost got in Class B trouble due to a flaky transponder. It had me at illegal altitudes, and very erratic speed indications (evidently variations in return latency). Eventually PNE Tower got hold of me on the radio, and asked me to make a pass over the airport at a particular altitude and airspeed. Their radar display was showing crazy stuff coming from my transponder, but looking out the window, it was obvious I was doing what I had been told.
That, and the fact that I interacted professionally with towers at PHL, PNE and sometimes TTN several times every day gave me a far better reputation than any piece of hardware from Happy Herbie's Used Airplane Lot. (That's what I called the excessively low-budget flight school/rental/charter biz I flew for.)
Leave a comment:
-
Bill, I'm reading/understanding that ADS-B data packets include speed as well as position and altitude. https://mode-s.org/decode/adsb/airborne-velocity.htmlOriginally posted by B.Butler View Post
The ADS-B transmits a sequence of positions, not speed.
"ADS-B Out works by broadcasting information about an aircraft's GPS location, altitude, ground speed and other data to ground stations and other aircraft, once per second." https://www.faa.gov/nextgen/equipads...ties/ins_outs/
From: https://www.icao.int/APAC/Meetings/2...B%20Basics.pdf
Leave a comment:
-
Ray -- ADS-B operates at 978 and 1090 MHz. The echoes that are discussed are from primary radar, not DME/Mode C transponders, as I understand it.Originally posted by Ray Tackett View Post
Yeahbut ... It's still a LOT of transmitters in one area, all operating at radar frequencies. The exact type of transmission, 1940s radar, Mode C transponder squawk, or ADS-B doesn't matter. The basic physics of wave interference still apply. I think the absence of a sonic boom is pretty strong evidence.
Leave a comment:
-
But who is calculating it? The aircraft or the ADS-B receiver?Originally posted by B.Butler View PostR = D/T ?
Taking a quick look at the packet format, there is a "Airborne velocities" field.
Leave a comment:
-
No. Speed is calculated from target displacement. D = RTOriginally posted by Russell Holton View PostSomeone remind me how ADS-B works? Isn't speed self-reported and comes from the on-board GPS receiver? Of course, I wouldn't rule out a scrambled data packet. All those ADS-B packets flying around, I wouldn't be surprised if two stepped on each other.
The real question is what was the "hits" just before and after that screen shot?
Leave a comment:
-
Someone remind me how ADS-B works? Isn't speed self-reported and comes from the on-board GPS receiver? Of course, I wouldn't rule out a scrambled data packet. All those ADS-B packets flying around, I wouldn't be surprised if two stepped on each other.
The real question is what was the "hits" just before and after that screen shot?
Leave a comment:
-
Yeahbut ... It's still a LOT of transmitters in one area, all operating at radar frequencies. The exact type of transmission, 1940s radar, Mode C transponder squawk, or ADS-B doesn't matter. The basic physics of wave interference still apply. I think the absence of a sonic boom is pretty strong evidence.Originally posted by Scott Dyer HPN/NY View PostRay, it's ADS-B only, so no live radar with echoes and all. Stephanie, I got a speed mod...it was a bad hit and scrambled my hex code.
Leave a comment:
-
Ray, it's ADS-B only, so no live radar with echoes and all. Stephanie, I got a speed mod...it was a bad hit and scrambled my hex code.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
When TW800 exploded in the same area, there was a missile theory with a realistic-looking radar track. The unlabeled, seemingly primary return, was acually an interference pattern from some combination of multiple radars and echoes. I believe it was Bill English (NTSB) who posted a detailed explanation here once it had been solved.
That is an area with a lot of radar coverage and a lot of aircraft, so I could believe another interference pattern. Did that track originate anywhere? Did it end anywhere? Did it even enter ane leave the image area, or did it just appear? Any reports of a sonic boom? Any real object going that fast at that altitude would produce one.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: