Long Flight

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Terry Carraway
    replied
    Originally posted by Gil Buettner View Post
    We were just talking about this today at the airport. A local Mooney pilot said he was burning 11 GPH on a long flight recently. I thought that was wrong, way too high. But the guy who told us that said the Mooney pilot claimed it was because he had the "big engine."

    I thought Mooneys were fuel efficient. I could match those numbers in my Bonanza.
    The big engines are TIO-540 or IO-550 or TSIO-550 turbo normalized. So similar to Bo. They can pull them way back, but it seems most are running at 16 - 17, but over 185 KTAS, some over 200.

    The little engine ones are IO-360 or TSIO-360. I have the TSIO so benefit from the TAS gains with flying high. Down low, I am about the same as the IO-360 planes, maybe a bit more fuel burn due to some losses with turbo.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rick Durden
    replied
    Originally posted by Terry Carraway View Post

    10.1 GPH
    Ouch! I burn at least 11 GPH in my 182 and I'm about to fly it from Idaho to Michigan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gil Buettner
    replied
    We were just talking about this today at the airport. A local Mooney pilot said he was burning 11 GPH on a long flight recently. I thought that was wrong, way too high. But the guy who told us that said the Mooney pilot claimed it was because he had the "big engine."

    I thought Mooneys were fuel efficient. I could match those numbers in my Bonanza.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Dyer DXR/CT
    replied
    That makes me feel a lot better, Terry.

    Leave a comment:


  • Terry Carraway
    replied
    Originally posted by Scott Dyer HPN/NY View Post

    That's what I was afraid of....2/3 of mine! IHM (I Hate Moonies).
    The good news is, the later big engine Mooneys are only slightly faster, but burn fuel at your rate.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Dyer DXR/CT
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy Alson
    replied
    (I Hate Moonies) Be nice now Scott!

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Dyer DXR/CT
    replied
    Originally posted by Terry Carraway View Post

    10.1 GPH
    That's what I was afraid of....2/3 of mine! IHM (I Hate Moonies).

    Leave a comment:


  • Terry Carraway
    replied
    Originally posted by A. Niemyer View Post
    Also EGT/CHTs?
    CHTs were under 370. I try to keep them under 380. 343, 362, 366, 340, 364, 319

    I don't recall EGTs. The one pic I have of the JPI does not have numbers. I can get them later off the data.

    TIT was 1610 on the JPI. Stock gauge was reading under 1400. I think the probe is shot, I am having a new one installed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Terry Carraway
    replied
    Originally posted by Scott Dyer HPN/NY View Post
    What was your fuel burn gph?
    10.1 GPH

    Leave a comment:


  • A. Niemyer
    replied
    Also EGT/CHTs?

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Dyer DXR/CT
    replied
    What was your fuel burn gph?

    Leave a comment:


  • Terry Carraway
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_2173 JPG.jpg
Views:	114
Size:	1.08 MB
ID:	24570

    Leave a comment:


  • John O'Shaughnessy [FCM]
    replied
    Originally posted by Terry Carraway View Post

    BTW, I burned less than 80 gallons BJC to 0W3.
    Wow. Nice.

    Leave a comment:


  • Terry Carraway
    replied
    I have done a number of longer flights. 6 hours home to Sarasota. 5.5 from home to Space Coast (yes I did visit Tom). 5.5 home to Rogers AR. 4 Mineral Wells to Denver.

    But once you get into the teens, it doesn't make sense to come down unless you are at your destination or need to.

    BTW, I burned less than 80 gallons BJC to 0W3.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X