New Glider Altitude Record
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Ray Tackett View Post76,100 feet
Yup, been watch’n this endeavor for awhile. Shoot’n for 90K . . . boggles the mind.
The concept of being at these kinds of altitudes, sans pressure suit, is beyond scary.
Don’t’cha know, at the true airspeeds they need to fly, they got’a be flirt’n with control surface flutter with attendant loss of the vehicle.
Regards,
Tom Charlton (who’d need to be proffered a huge pile of cash to do what they’re doing)
"The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ralph Jones View PostAnd I thought I did a good one with 32,000...
I’ve flown aerial mapping flights at 25K in an unpressurized Cessna 411 long ago. Even with a diluter demand system scared the bejesus out’a me<g>. I guy can catch a case of stupid then dead real quick up there<ng>.
Regards,
Tom Charlton
"The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Charlton View PostHi Ralph,
I’ve flown aerial mapping flights at 25K in an unpressurized Cessna 411 long ago. Even with a diluter demand system scared the bejesus out’a me<g>. I guy can catch a case of stupid then dead real quick up there<ng>.
Regards,
Tom CharltonI Earned my Spurs in Vietnam
48th AHC 1971-72
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Charlton View PostHi Ralph,
I’ve flown aerial mapping flights at 25K in an unpressurized Cessna 411 long ago. Even with a diluter demand system scared the bejesus out’a me<g>. I guy can catch a case of stupid then dead real quick up there<ng>.
Regards,
Tom Charlton
And they did a tow up to 40K. So, while very high, not so much altitude gain.
My best was 18,000 in WV in a Grob 102.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Randy Sohn View PostSchwiezer (spellling?) 1-23
Comment
-
Originally posted by Terry Carraway View PostThe glider is actually pressurized.
Ya’but Terry, Won’t be pressurized when high speed aileron flutter rips the wing off. At altitude they’re flying a high % of mach.
* At 90,000 ft air density is less than 2% of what it is at sea level.
* TAS at 90,000 is 350 knots.
* M1 is about 585 kt. So flying at about mach 0.6.
* Wing span of 84 feet.
* I'm sure they've done the engineering but . . . mighty fast for a long, experimental, slender wing.
The Perlan Project is an internationally celebrated, world record setting climate and aerospace research project.
And they did a tow up to 40K. So, while very high, not so much altitude gain.
My best was 18,000 in WV in a Grob 102.
Regards,
Tom Charlton
"The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ralph Jones View PostSchweizer. German fiberglass squeezed them out of the glider market a while back and they're a helicopter company now, though there are a lot of their products still flying. Their 2-32 had a wide back seat that could hold two people, and most of that fleet got bought up by a tourist-ride chain.
And the 1-26 is still a well patronized one design class.
I have time in 2-33, 1-26, and 1-36.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tom Charlton View Post* The cabin will be pressurized to 8.5 psi (14,500 feet). Pure oxygen rebreather system.
Ya’but Terry, Won’t be pressurized when high speed aileron flutter rips the wing off. At altitude they’re flying a high % of mach.
* At 90,000 ft air density is less than 2% of what it is at sea level.
* TAS at 90,000 is 350 knots.
* M1 is about 585 kt. So flying at about mach 0.6.
* Wing span of 84 feet.
* I'm sure they've done the engineering but . . . mighty fast for a long, experimental, slender wing.
The Perlan Project is an internationally celebrated, world record setting climate and aerospace research project.
No question they could use the wave to get to 40K. It’s the fact that they are able to continue on up!
Hey . . . I got to cloud bases in a clunky ole schweizer here in FL<ha>. Can’t do da wave here<g>!
Regards,
Tom Charlton
No, the used a tow plane to 40K, not the wave. In that region, the bottom of the wave could be well into the upper 20s, low 30s.
Even more impressive, I did a 1+10 in a 2-33 in thermals just west of San Antonio.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Terry Carraway View Post
And how many people got their primary training in a 2-33, or the predecessor, the 2-22, also known as the Brick. ]
And the 1-26 is still a well patronized one design class.
I have time in 2-33, 1-26, and 1-36.Tom Tyson-A&P
Pilots without Mechanics are just Pedestrians with fancy watches . . .
( . . . and Mechanics without Pilots are Unemployed.)
Comment
-
Good to see that many avsiggers have sailplane experience in their past.
Hard to pinpoint exactly any one thing about that background that forever makes you a better pilot, but better pilot you are.
Regards,
Tom Charlton
"The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Comment
-
Hard to pinpoint exactly any one thing about that background that forever makes you a better pilot, but better pilot you are.
Lotsa "systems operators" with pilot certificates these automated, glass cockpit days.
(My glider time is one ride.)Geology rocks, but geography is where it's at.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray Tackett View PostHow about stick-and-rudder skills and a solid feel for energy management? I got mine in wood-and-fabric taildraggers without flaps. Aerobatics in a Stearman were a big part of it for me. Cubs on wheels and skis did a lot, too.
Yup, all that stuff sort’a cumulatively adds up and makes a positive difference.
Lotsa "systems operators" with pilot certificates these automated, glass cockpit days.
Suspect there’ll be additional such events with higher demand for pilots and more pilot-mill / ab-initio training.
Hoping my Southwest crew to Dilute and return are a bunch of sailplane, tailwheel love’n aerobatic aficionado geezers.<g>
Regards,
Tom Charlton"The aeroplane has unveiled for us the true face of the earth." - Antoine de Saint-Exupery
Comment
Comment