RNAV Arrival

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bill Bridges
    replied
    Originally posted by Scott Dyer HPN/NY View Post

    Bill - Andy covered it....
    I grew up on DoD plates and Procedural Tracks have a different meaning to me than when I am using Jepps. The Jepps seem to use them differently so when I see something like the HILT the thought crosses my mine "Do I fly it as published or can I enter like I would normally?"

    Thanks for the clarification.


    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Dyer HPN/NY
    replied
    Originally posted by Andy Alson View Post

    You can use any of standard hold entries in to the published hold which would include the teardrop entry you proposed. The entry into a published hold is not mandated, only the hold itself.

    Andy
    Thanks, Andy, I was out doing a little skywriting this afternoon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Dyer HPN/NY
    replied
    Originally posted by Bill Bridges View Post
    Scott,

    Must the entry into the HILPT be flown as published, or can it be flown by turning outbound on a heading of 114 at ORMAN for one minute then a right turn to reverse course and join the 324 inbound course to ORTMN?
    Bill - Andy covered it. Just remember your maximum holding speeds as you simulate flying jet aircraft.

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy Alson
    replied
    Originally posted by Bill Bridges View Post
    Scott,

    Must the entry into the HILPT be flown as published, or can it be flown by turning outbound on a heading of 114 at ORMAN for one minute then a right turn to reverse course and join the 324 inbound course to ORTMN?
    You can use any of standard hold entries in to the published hold which would include the teardrop entry you proposed. The entry into a published hold is not mandated, only the hold itself.

    Andy

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill Bridges
    replied
    Originally posted by John O'Shaughnessy [FCM] View Post

    Unless I am missing something, NoPT IS shown on that plate between the IAF at WAGNR and ORTMN. Or are you asking what would be required if it wasn't shown? (Which Scott answered).
    John,

    I was asking "what would be required if it wasn't shown." I saw a similar approach (MWCR RNAV08) into a non-radar facility this week. It was the first time I had seen a HILT on an RNAV approach.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill Bridges
    replied
    Scott,

    Must the entry into the HILPT be flown as published, or can it be flown by turning outbound on a heading of 114 at ORMAN for one minute then a right turn to reverse course and join the 324 inbound course to ORTMN?

    Leave a comment:


  • John O'Shaughnessy [FCM]
    replied
    Originally posted by Bill Bridges View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_312.jpg
Views:	459
Size:	115.9 KB
ID:	4846
    In the above example when NoPT is not present on the inbound Track (WAGNR) can the aircraft turn inbound at the IAF (ORTMN)
    Unless I am missing something, NoPT IS shown on that plate between the IAF at WAGNR and ORTMN. Or are you asking what would be required if it wasn't shown? (Which Scott answered).

    Leave a comment:


  • Scott Dyer HPN/NY
    replied
    Originally posted by Bill Bridges View Post
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_312.jpg
Views:	459
Size:	115.9 KB
ID:	4846
    In the above example when NoPT is not present on the inbound Track (WAGNR) can the aircraft turn inbound at the IAF (ORTMN) or must it turn outbound and follow the outbound track to reverse course?
    Bill -- If you are flying the segment from WAGNR to ORTMN, and there is no NOPT on the chart, then you must fly the HILPT. Were you cleared, for example, from somewhere southeast of ORTMN direct to ORTMN and then for the "straight in" approach, then you would not fly the HILPT (unless you received an express clearance to do so). And if you were vectored to final between ORTMN and BARRY you would not fly the course reversal.

    See the AIM: 5−4−9. Procedure Turn and Hold−in−lieu of
    Procedure Turn
    a. A procedure turn is the maneuver prescribed
    when it is necessary to reverse direction to establish
    the aircraft inbound on an intermediate or final
    approach course. The procedure turn or hold−in−
    lieu−of−PT is a required maneuver when it is depicted
    on the approach chart, unless cleared by ATC for a
    straight−in approach. Additionally, the procedure
    turn or hold−in−lieu−of−PT is not permitted when the
    symbol “No PT” is depicted on the initial segment
    being used, when a RADAR VECTOR to the final
    approach course is provided, or when conducting a
    timed approach from a holding fix.
    The altitude
    prescribed for the procedure turn is a minimum
    altitude until the aircraft is established on the inbound
    course. The maneuver must be completed within the
    distance specified in the profile view. For a
    hold−in−lieu−of−PT, the holding pattern direction
    must be flown as depicted and the specified leg
    length/timing must not be exceeded.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill Bridges
    replied
    Click image for larger version

Name:	image_312.jpg
Views:	459
Size:	115.9 KB
ID:	4846
    In the above example when NoPT is not present on the inbound Track (WAGNR) can the aircraft turn inbound at the IAF (ORTMN) or must it turn outbound and follow the outbound track to reverse course?
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Bill Bridges
    started a topic RNAV Arrival

    RNAV Arrival

    I need to rethink my question and come back later.
    Last edited by Bill Bridges; 06-22-2018, 20:04.
Working...
X